Playbook
    Pricing & Bundling

    Servitisation is Rising: Why as-a-Service models are redefining business

    Discover the key idea behind 'as-a-Service,' its timing, how to make it a win-win-win, and real success stories in our whitepaper. Transform your industry now.

    5 min read
    Servitisation is Rising: Why as-a-Service models are redefining business

    Nos ressources sont publiées principalement en anglais. La navigation et les descriptions sont traduites.

    Abstract:

    This whitepaper provides a thorough exploration of Servitisation and 'as-a-Service' businessmodels, detailing their advantages for manufacturers, customers, and the environment. Itincludes real-world examples, a timely analysis of why the current market conditions are ripefor the development of such models, and outlines P2S Management Consulting’s tailoredapproach to guide companies in conceptualising and developing ‘as-a-Service’ models. It is acomprehensive guide for businesses looking to navigate the shift towards service-basedmodels while contributing positively to the planet and a company’s bottom line.

    Introduction:

    In 2018, Atlas-Copco, a world-leading provider of sustainable productivity solutions,introduced its Air-as-a-Service model, a paradigm shift in the compressed air industry.Traditionally, customers would invest heavily in air compressors, which come with associatedmaintenance and upgrade costs. With Atlas-Copco's model, customers no longer purchaseair compressors but rather pay for the cubic metres of compressed air they consume. This reduces the upfront capital expenses and shifts the responsibility of maintenance, uptime,and upgrades to Atlas-Copco. The model is eco-friendly too, as Atlas-Copco focuses onenergy-efficient solutions, ensuring that customers consume compressed air sustainably.

    This is just one example of a manufacturer that developed an ‘as-a-Service’ offering. Inspiredby other manufacturers and by B2C subscription successes like Netflix and Spotify, manymanufacturers are complementing their sales portfolio by developing their own ‘as-aService’ offerings.

    ‘as-a-Service’, also known as ‘Servitisation’ or ’XaaS’, (hereafter jointly referred to as ‘‘as-aService’’), are innovative subscription-based business models that bundle equipment,services, and software into a continuous solution. Instead of a single outright CapitalExpenditure (CapEx) purchase, customers engage in a recurring payment model, tailoredaround access, usage, output, or performance.

    In this article, we will explore successful ‘as-a-Service’ models such as Rolls-Royce’s 'Jet-Engineas-a-Service', Signify’s ‘Light-as-a-Service’, Engel's 'Injection-moulding-as-a-Service' or Michelin’s ‘Tyres-as-a-Service’ models, and discover how these companies complementedtheir sales portfolio with new ‘as-a-Service’ offerings.

    The advantage of this model for customers is that it equips them with state-of-the-art technology without the initial hefty price tag. They will pay a fee which typically coversequipment financing, associated services, and performance guarantees. The essence ofsubscription isn't mere financing; it centres on optimising Overall Equipment Effectiveness(OEE), reducing Total Cost of Ownership (TCO), and working towards a more sustainable wayof doing business.

    Frequently asked questions

    Q: What is the practical difference between usage-based and outcome-based pricing?

    A: Usage-based pricing charges for measured consumption (hours, cycles, units processed) - the customer pays for what they use. Outcome-based pricing charges for a defined result (uptime percentage, yield, availability) - the OEM takes on delivery risk. Usage-based is simpler to implement; outcome-based creates stronger differentiation but requires a more mature operating model.

    Q: How do you choose between a flat subscription, usage-based, and outcome-based model?

    A: Start with metering maturity and risk appetite. If you cannot reliably measure usage, start with a flat subscription. If you can meter but are not ready to guarantee outcomes, go usage-based. If you can measure, deliver, and absorb performance risk, outcome-based pricing captures the most value. Many OEMs progress through these stages sequentially.

    Q: What infrastructure does an OEM need before launching usage-based pricing?

    A: At minimum: a metering system that records consumption reliably, a data pipeline that feeds into invoicing, contract terms that define how usage is counted and billed, and a dispute resolution process for measurement disagreements. IoT makes this easier but is not always required - manual reads or periodic inspections can work for early deals.

    Q: How do you structure pricing bands and caps in a usage or outcome model?

    A: Use a floor (minimum commitment) to protect the OEM's base economics, a target band (normal pricing per unit), and a cap (maximum charge) to protect the customer from runaway costs. This structure gives both parties predictability and makes budget approval easier on the customer side.

    Prêt à explorer votre prochaine étape vers les revenus récurrents ou l'As-a-Service ?

    Nous vous aidons à évaluer l'opportunité, identifier les risques et définir l'étape suivante la plus crédible.

    Réserver un appel