Playbook
    Pricing & Bundling

    Servitisation is Rising: Why as-a-Service models are redefining business

    Discover the key idea behind 'as-a-Service,' its timing, how to make it a win-win-win, and real success stories in our whitepaper. Transform your industry now.

    5 min read
    Servitisation is Rising: Why as-a-Service models are redefining business

    Unsere Inhalte werden überwiegend auf Englisch veröffentlicht. Navigation und Beschreibungen sind übersetzt.

    Abstract:

    This whitepaper provides a thorough exploration of Servitisation and 'as-a-Service' businessmodels, detailing their advantages for manufacturers, customers, and the environment. Itincludes real-world examples, a timely analysis of why the current market conditions are ripefor the development of such models, and outlines P2S Management Consulting’s tailoredapproach to guide companies in conceptualising and developing ‘as-a-Service’ models. It is acomprehensive guide for businesses looking to navigate the shift towards service-basedmodels while contributing positively to the planet and a company’s bottom line.

    Introduction:

    In 2018, Atlas-Copco, a world-leading provider of sustainable productivity solutions,introduced its Air-as-a-Service model, a paradigm shift in the compressed air industry.Traditionally, customers would invest heavily in air compressors, which come with associatedmaintenance and upgrade costs. With Atlas-Copco's model, customers no longer purchaseair compressors but rather pay for the cubic metres of compressed air they consume. This reduces the upfront capital expenses and shifts the responsibility of maintenance, uptime,and upgrades to Atlas-Copco. The model is eco-friendly too, as Atlas-Copco focuses onenergy-efficient solutions, ensuring that customers consume compressed air sustainably.

    This is just one example of a manufacturer that developed an ‘as-a-Service’ offering. Inspiredby other manufacturers and by B2C subscription successes like Netflix and Spotify, manymanufacturers are complementing their sales portfolio by developing their own ‘as-aService’ offerings.

    ‘as-a-Service’, also known as ‘Servitisation’ or ’XaaS’, (hereafter jointly referred to as ‘‘as-aService’’), are innovative subscription-based business models that bundle equipment,services, and software into a continuous solution. Instead of a single outright CapitalExpenditure (CapEx) purchase, customers engage in a recurring payment model, tailoredaround access, usage, output, or performance.

    In this article, we will explore successful ‘as-a-Service’ models such as Rolls-Royce’s 'Jet-Engineas-a-Service', Signify’s ‘Light-as-a-Service’, Engel's 'Injection-moulding-as-a-Service' or Michelin’s ‘Tyres-as-a-Service’ models, and discover how these companies complementedtheir sales portfolio with new ‘as-a-Service’ offerings.

    The advantage of this model for customers is that it equips them with state-of-the-art technology without the initial hefty price tag. They will pay a fee which typically coversequipment financing, associated services, and performance guarantees. The essence ofsubscription isn't mere financing; it centres on optimising Overall Equipment Effectiveness(OEE), reducing Total Cost of Ownership (TCO), and working towards a more sustainable wayof doing business.

    Häufig gestellte Fragen

    F: What is Outcome-Based Pricing?

    A: Outcome-Based Pricing ties payment to a measurable business result delivered to the customer, such as uptime, output or performance. The agreement needs an accepted baseline, measurement method and commercial response to different performance levels. It is not simply pricing by usage or adding a performance claim to a fixed equipment price.

    F: What is the practical difference between Pay-per-Use and Outcome-Based Pricing?

    A: Pay-per-Use charges for measured consumption, while Outcome-Based Pricing charges for a defined result. A customer can use equipment for many hours without achieving the intended output or uptime. Outcome pricing therefore requires the provider to accept more performance responsibility and to define which outcome drivers each party controls.

    F: How do you choose an outcome for industrial pricing?

    A: Choose an outcome the customer values, can measure credibly and the provider can materially influence through equipment, service and monitoring. Uptime, output and performance can work when the baseline and responsibilities are clear. Do not guarantee results that depend mainly on customer behaviour or processes outside the provider's control.

    F: How should performance bands work in an outcome-based contract?

    A: Performance bands translate measured results into defined commercial consequences. A target zone can carry the agreed price, a shortfall zone can trigger a credit, and an upside zone can support a bonus where appropriate. Bands reflect operational variability more effectively than one all-or-nothing threshold and make the risk easier to model.

    F: How can a provider limit risk in Outcome-Based Pricing?

    A: Limit risk by defining baselines, measurement windows, responsibilities, exclusions, performance bands and caps before the contract is signed. Model downside exposure across the portfolio, not only for one deal. Where both parties influence the result, use shared-risk structures rather than making the provider accountable for every external variable.

    F: What operating capabilities are needed for Outcome-Based Pricing?

    A: The provider needs reliable outcome data, monitoring, escalation, service capacity and a cost-to-serve view that connects operational performance to contract economics. Sales and legal teams also need standard guardrails. Without those capabilities, the firm can sell a performance promise that it cannot monitor, manage or deliver profitably.

    Bereit für Ihren nächsten Schritt zu wiederkehrenden Umsätzen oder As-a-Service?

    Wir helfen Ihnen, das Potenzial zu bewerten, Risiken zu erkennen und den glaubwürdigsten nächsten Schritt zu definieren.

    Gespräch buchen